킴킴 + 친구들 : 생명의 물, 2026
Kim Kim + Friends ; The Water of Life, 2026
2026. 11.3 - 12. 31
실학박물관
기획: 킴킴갤러리
참여; 이수진, 이혜임, 오지용, 장뽈리, 조진경, 김전, 김현주, 김진아
킴킴 + 친구들 : 생명의 물, 2026
Kim Kim + Friends ; The Water of Life, 2026
2026. 11.3 - 12. 31
실학박물관
기획: 킴킴갤러리
참여; 이수진, 이혜임, 오지용, 장뽈리, 조진경, 김전, 김현주, 김진아
https://www.koreajoongangdaily.com/lifestyle/beauty-in-the-bizarre-couple-nayoungim-and-gregory-maass-hold-exhibition-at-atelier-herms/12432349?searchFlag=1
Published
Atelier Hermès in Gangnam District, southern Seoul, on Thursday.
The duo is holding the solo exhibition “Paranoia Paradise” at the venue.
Nayoungim, whose real name is Kim Na-young, defines their chemistry as symbiosis. Maass, on the other hand, was more of a romantic: “It’s about love,” he said. “I have a dark character, but Nayoung is very positive. So, we are very different.”
They consider themselves a good team because they complement each other through their differences, especially when it comes to their work process. Generally, they would begin a piece each doing what they are good at — for instance Maass welds and Kim embroiders — together to produce outlandish, enigmatic works that are based on a method they call “Frankensteining.”
The concept derives from Mary Shelley’s famed 1818 novel of the same name in which the titular mad scientist gathers stolen body parts from charnel houses or mortuaries and electrifies a monster to life. Likewise, both Maass and Kim collect random objects, like folding screens, coins, dentures and flyswatters, to combine them and give them a fresh breath of life as an artwork. They come in such different shapes and sizes, ranging from paintings, sculptures and large-scale public installations, that it’s almost impossible to categorize what the duo’s signature work is.
The “Paranoia Paradise” exhibition, filled with some 60 new works, emphasizes the duo’s comprehensive attitude toward art rather than the meaning behind each single piece, according to Ahn So-yeon, artistic director at Atelier Hermès.
Collectively, the works tackle the “hybridity and grotesque,” which were prominent concepts for the duo since they were students in the 1990s. They intentionally avoid “perfection” because it’s too easy to achieve, Ahn said. The difficult part is actually rebelling against deep-rooted social norms, which is why they strive for eccentricity.
“Flower Nap 1~4” is a major example on view at the exhibition that expresses this attitude. The piece is composed of four traditional Asian hanging scrolls embroidered with flowers that are each paired with a flyswatter. The irony lies in the contrast between the beautiful silk stitching of nature’s beauty that attracts insects and a tool that instead kills them.
“Pairing these two disparate objects shows that even in a paradise, in the case of these flowers taking a nap, there is bound to be an entity that causes disturbance, like the flies, hence a paranoia,” Ahn said.
The duo’s explanation behind each artwork exists like a separate, perplexing entity that cannot be grouped together into one coherent plot. During the press conference, Maass would mention that psychology is not a science, but a form of literature. He would also equate ugliness and beauty in terms of worth. And he spoke about how the duo aims to show as much as they can before pointing out, “But what we are really exhibiting is nothing, because there’s nothing in between the objects, but it’s a good nothing. It’s not like ‘nothing left to lose’ or ‘nothing to hope for.’”
Because much of the duo’s artworks are identified by the arbitrary components, they are generally defined as readymades. But Maass and Kim approach their pieces as postproduction, in the sense that they alter and put the individual objects into new contexts.
“It’s meaningless to try and invent something completely new in the present day,” Ahn said. “For these two artists, it’s about how you’re going to reinterpret an already existing object and give it a new purpose.”
The duo oftentimes does that with famous entities, like a chain of plastic pickles each with the face of American actor Nicolas Cage (they nicknamed it “Picolas Cage”), a canvas with a stitching of Minnie Mouse stained with coffee and a large-scale Hello Kitty sculpture that has two faces, front and back, like the ancient Roman god Janus.
The coffee stains on the embroidery piece, titled “Mini Mouse” (2020-24), was made deliberate to prove a point: that it’s real, as opposed to the beloved Disney character. The duo claims that she is not really a mouse, but an illusion.
“We [humans] project ourselves on an animal,” Maass said, giving an example through the shark. “We don’t like the animal side of the shark, but we like the aggressiveness of the shark. But we don’t like to encounter them.”
The same goes for Hello Kitty with the “Kitty Enlightenment” installation. Everyone thinks the character is a cat, but Sanrio has previously revealed that she's supposed to be a little girl.
Nayoungim and Gregory Maass, who have been working together since 2004 as an artist duo, are also a married couple. Call it what you want, but they refuse to be referred to as a “collaboration.”
“We do not collaborate. ‘Collaborate’ sounds like a word from the war,” Maass said during a press conference.
works by Nayoungim & Gregory Maass, ATELIER HERMES
From left: "Size Matters," "Roman Gentleman's Goblet,"
"By Any Means Necessary (Dionysus),"
"아미타불 Amitabha Buddha," "Good Riddance (FOKOF)" and "Bikini Bottom"
History of smoking started in Central and South America, where tobacco is a native plant.
The Jama-Coaque culture of Ecuador was already smoking before 500 BC. Their tubular pipes can be sculpturally decorated.
In Mexico, many pre-Columbian pipes are found in shaft tombs, an indication of their ritual use. The pipes are well preserved because they are made of earthenware, a fire-resistant material which is important for a pipe.
In the classical period, from the year 0 to 900, many pipes in the Michoacan area of western Mexico are sculptured. Decorated pipes in the shape of a ribbed mescaline cactus were popular. In addition, numerous other designs have been worked out over time, such as pipes with a triangular platform at the front of the pipe bowl.
The Purepecha or Tarascan of the later era, around 1200, are known for their pipes with large funnel-shaped bowls. At the bottom of the bowl we see two slender legs. Glaze did not exist in that period, but instead a beautifully polished engobe provided a light shine and exclusive appearance.




A record of the Chiba International Art Festival 2025.
Specifications: A4 size, 184 pages, full color
[Contents]
(1) Three keywords for opening the Chiba International Art Festival 2025
(2) Introduction of citizen-participatory art and projects held in six areas of the city
(3) A look back at the Chiba International Art Festival 2025
This record introduces how familiar landscapes that have been cherished by local people, such as train platforms, housing complexes, and closed greengrocers, take on new faces through the art festival. We believe that this will be of interest to a wide range of citizens, from children to the elderly, as well as art fans. In addition, it includes a wealth of photographs that convey what happened during the festival, allowing readers to visually experience the atmosphere of the venues and convey the charm of the art festival.
[Chiba International Art Festival 2025 Overview]
With the aim of creating opportunities for citizens to experience art projects more easily and to become aware of and familiar with the charm of art and the local area, this citizen-participatory art festival featured exhibitions of 37 citizen-participatory art projects by 32 artists from Japan and abroad. Unearthing little-known places with local charm, such as urban gaps, vacant shops, and public spaces that tend to be buried in everyday life, from the perspective of artists, the festival was held with a focus on six areas as arts fields (cultural creative hubs) for art projects.
수원시립미술관 '▭No(빈칸) …' 기획전
토탈미술관 50주년 특별전
To mark its 50th anniversary, the Total Museum of Contemporary Art presents the special exhibition Korean Art Year Zero: 42 Stories.
Founded in 1976 as Total Gallery in Dongseung-dong, Seoul, and later moving to Jangheung before establishing its current home in Pyeongchang-dong, Total Museum has been a vital part of experimental practices in Korean contemporary art for the past half-century. Rather than presenting a retrospective celebrating its own history, this exhibition begins with a question: Where might Korean art begin again?
The “zero” in the exhibition’s title does not signify emptiness or absence. It marks a point where endings and beginnings converge—a moment when familiar standards and established orders are unsettled, giving rise to new questions.
Spanning more than 120 years, from Korean migration to Hawaii in 1903 to the present day, Korean Art Year Zero: 42 Stories brings together artworks and images created across different periods and contexts, reconnecting them with personal memories and historical and social events.
The exhibition unfolds throughout the museum, extending beyond its galleries into the basement, annex, garden, rooftop, and even the open air surrounding the building. Corridors, stairways, and other interior architectural spaces become part of the exhibition, while the museum’s outdoor environment is also brought into its expanded spatial framework.
The 42 storefronts are conceived as distinct yet loosely interconnected stories. Rather than following a single chronology or established art-historical lineage, the exhibition focuses on the questions and tensions that emerge when seemingly unrelated works encounter one another. As visitors move between the museum’s interior and exterior spaces, they are invited to discover their own connections and interpretations among different times, artworks, events, and memories.
A central question runs throughout the exhibition: What can art do in times of turmoil? Over the past century and more, Korean society and the wider world have experienced colonialism, war, national division, migration, industrialization, democratization, rapid technological development, and profound social transformation. Artists have responded to these realities in their own distinct ways, seeking to understand and engage with the world around them.
The exhibition connects these artistic practices to the fundamental question of mourning. Here, mourning extends beyond grief over personal loss. It is understood as an artistic attitude: remembering what is disappearing, confronting the wounds of history, and discovering the possibility of continuing to live despite them.
One work that symbolically embodies the exhibition’s title is Kwak Duck-jun’s scale piece. A stone rests on a scale, yet its needle points to zero. Has the stone lost its weight, or has the system intended to measure it ceased to function properly? In this paradoxical image, zero signifies not nothingness, but the moment when established systems of measurement and judgment can no longer adequately explain the world.
In the museum garden, Hong Myung-seop presents an installation using stainless-steel lines and multicolored cords that traverse the architecture and surrounding outdoor space. Connecting the ground, the building, and the open air, these lines transform the museum’s exterior into an expansive spatial drawing. Nearby, Kim Kulim poses the question, “Art? Mart? Arty?” challenging the boundaries between art and the marketplace, and between artistic expression and commercial value.
The exhibition’s first story brings together Moon Hyeong-min’s Bikini Virgin and Lee Yongbaek’s Pietà. Images associated with mass consumer culture intersect with the history of nuclear testing at Bikini Atoll in the Pacific and the mourning of a mother who has lost her child. The encounter between seemingly unrelated images and historical events exemplifies the exhibition’s approach to constructing relationships between works.
Elsewhere, Moon Hyeong-min’s Mickey Mouse, made from candle wax, transforms an icon of consumer culture and capitalism into a figure destined to melt and disappear. A large black mouse in the basement and a small red mouse in the annex reappear in different forms as visitors move through the exhibition, allowing them to experience the recurring image and its transformations.
The exhibition’s final story centers on Kim Beom’s video painting Yellow Scream. The artist combines the act of applying yellow paint to a canvas with screams of varying pitches, bringing together color, voice, brushwork, and emotion in a single artistic act.
Instead of a golden monument commemorating the museum’s 50th anniversary, the exhibition concludes with a yellow scream—a color charged with shifting voices and emotions. This final space also features Shin Meekyoung’s Kore and Joo Jae-hwan’s Spring Rain Descending a Staircase (Boy Urinating), among other works that evoke mythology and everyday life, death and regeneration.
In this way, the exhibition returns to its point of departure: zero.
Korean Art Year Zero: 42 Stories does not seek to present a definitive history of Korean art or organize the past into a completed narrative. Instead, it reconnects artworks and images from different periods with individual memories and social events, opening up possibilities for new relationships and interpretations yet to be discovered.
Extending beyond the museum’s physical boundaries—encompassing its interior and exterior, the ground and the open air—this special exhibition looks back on Total Museum’s 50-year history while asking what art can remember, mourn, and imagine anew as it moves through times of turmoil.
Participating Artists | Kwak Duck-Jun, Quac Insik, Kong Sunghun, Geum Nuri, Kim Kulim, Kim Doo-jin, Kim Beom, Kim Bora, Kim Bong-jun, Kim Seok-hwan, Kim Seung-yeon, Kim Yang-dong, Kim Wook-kyu, Kim Yun-shin, Kim Joo-young A, Kim Joo-young B, Kim Tae-hyup, Kim Hyo-yeon, Namgoong Hwan, Noh Suntag, Du Kim, Ru Kim, Moon Seo-jin, Moon Hyeong-min, Park Kyung / Storefront, Park Ki-il, Park Seo-bo, Bang & Lee, Nam June Paik, VAKKI, Suh Yong-sun, Seo Hyo-jung, Sung Neung Kyung, Sung Wan-kyung, Sung Chan-kyung, Son Sang-ki, Song Sung-jin, Song Ho-jun, Shin Meekyoung, Shim Moon-seup, Shim Jeong-soo, Yayo, Yaloo, Omyocho, Oh Min, Yoo Hyun-mi, Lee Kang-so, Lee Kun-Yong, Lee Do-young, Lee Soon-jong, Lee Seung-taek, Lee Yongbaek, Lee Woong-chul, Lee Yuum, Lee Eun-jung, Lee Sang-hyun, Jang Ji-a, Jung Da-woon, Jung Min-su, Joo Jae-hwan, Theresa Hak Kyung Cha, Choi Sung-ho, Pilseung, Hong Myung-seop
Dates | October 16, 2026 (Fri) – February 28, 2027 (Sun)
Venue | Total Museum of Contemporary Art
Chief Curator | Lee Young-chul
Head Curator | Nathalie Boseul Shin
Head of Administration | Won Yoon-hee
Curators | Kim Min-seon, Yun Hyun-min
Coordinators | Kim Ban-suk, Kim Seo-yeon, Lee Chae-ryung
토탈미술관은 개관 50주년을 맞아 특별전 《한국미술 0년: 42개의 이야기》를 개최한다.
1976년 서울 동숭동 토탈갤러리에서 출발해 장흥을 거쳐 평창동에 자리 잡은 토탈미술관은 지난 반세기 동안 한국현대미술의 다양한 실험과 함께해 왔다. 이번 전시는 그 역사를 기념하는 회고전이 아니라, 한국미술이 어디에서 다시 시작될 수 있는가라는 질문에서 출발한다.
전시 제목의 ‘0’은 아무것도 없는 상태를 의미하지 않는다. 끝과 시작이 맞닿는 지점이자, 익숙한 기준과 질서가 흔들리면서 새로운 질문이 발생하는 자리다.
《한국미술 0년: 42개의 이야기》는 1903년 하와이 이주에서 오늘에 이르기까지 120여 년의 시간을 가로지르며, 서로 다른 시대와 문맥에서 탄생한 작품과 이미지, 개인의 기억과 사회적 사건을 새롭게 연결한다.
전시는 미술관 전관을 비롯해 지하와 별관, 정원과 옥상, 건물 외부의 허공까지 아우르며 펼쳐진다. 전시실과 복도, 계단 등 건축물 내부뿐 아니라 미술관을 둘러싼 외부 환경까지 전시의 영역으로 끌어들인다.
42개의 스토어프런트(storefront)는 각각 독립적인 이야기이면서도 서로 느슨하게 연결된다. 하나의 연대기나 미술사적 계보를 따라가는 대신, 이질적인 작품들이 만날 때 발생하는 질문과 긴장에 주목한다. 관람객은 미술관의 안과 밖을 이동하며 서로 다른 시간과 작품, 사건과 기억 사이에서 자신만의 연결과 해석을 만들어갈 수 있다.
이번 전시를 관통하는 중요한 질문은 ‘난세 속에서 예술은 무엇을 할 수 있는가’이다. 지난 100여 년 동안 한국 사회와 세계는 식민과 전쟁, 분단과 이주, 산업화와 민주화, 급격한 기술 발전과 사회적 변화를 겪어왔다. 예술가들은 이러한 현실 속에서 저마다의 방식으로 세계를 인식하고 대응해 왔다.
전시는 이러한 예술적 실천을 근원적인 ‘애도’의 문제와 연결한다. 여기에서 애도는 개인적인 상실에 대한 슬픔에 머무르지 않는다. 사라져가는 것들을 기억하고, 시대의 상처를 마주하며, 그럼에도 다시 살아갈 가능성을 발견하는 예술의 태도와 맞닿아 있다.
곽덕준의 저울 작업은 이번 전시의 제목을 상징적으로 보여준다. 저울 위에 돌 하나가 놓여 있지만 바늘은 ‘0’을 가리킨다. 돌의 무게가 사라진 것일까, 아니면 무게를 측정하는 시스템이 제대로 작동하지 않는 것일까. 이 역설적인 장면에서 ‘0’은 무(無)가 아니라, 기존의 척도가 더 이상 세계를 온전히 설명하지 못하는 순간을 드러내는 기호가 된다.
미술관 정원에서는 홍명섭이 스테인리스 선과 다채로운 색의 줄을 이용해 건축물과 외부 공간을 가로지르는 작업을 선보인다. 선들은 땅과 건물, 허공을 연결하며 미술관의 외부 공간 전체를 하나의 거대한 공간 드로잉으로 확장한다. 그 곁에서 김구림은 “Art냐, Mart냐, Arty냐”라는 질문을 통해 예술과 시장, 예술적인 것과 상품적인 것의 경계를 흔든다.
전시의 첫 번째 이야기에서는 문형민의 ‘비키니 버진(Bikini Virgin)’과 이용백의 ‘피에타(Pietà)’가 마주한다. 대량소비문화의 이미지와 태평양 비키니 환초에서 이루어진 핵실험의 역사, 자식을 잃은 어머니의 애도가 한 공간에서 교차한다. 서로 무관해 보이는 이미지와 사건의 충돌은 이번 전시가 이야기를 구성하는 방식을 보여준다.
한편, 문형민이 초로 제작한 미키마우스는 소비문화와 자본주의의 상징을 소멸하는 형상으로 바꾸어 놓는다. 미술관 지하의 검은 쥐와 별관의 붉은 쥐는 전시 공간을 가로지르며 반복적으로 등장하고, 관람객은 그 이미지가 변주되는 과정을 경험한다.
전시의 마지막 이야기는 김범의 영상 회화 작품 〈노란 비명〉이다. 작가는 노란색 물감을 칠하는 행위와 다양한 높낮이의 비명을 결합해 색채와 목소리, 붓질과 감정을 하나의 행위로 연결한다.
50주년을 상징하는 황금빛 기념비 대신, 끊임없이 변화하는 목소리와 감정이 뒤섞인 노란 비명이 전시의 마지막을 장식한다. 그 곁에는 신미경의 〈코레(Kore)〉와 주재환의 〈계단을 내려오는 봄비(오줌을 누는 소년)〉 등 신화와 일상, 죽음과 재생을 환기하는 작품들이 함께 놓인다.
그렇게 전시는 다시 처음의 ‘0’으로 돌아간다.
《한국미술 0년: 42개의 이야기》는 하나의 한국미술사를 제시하거나 지난 역사를 완결된 이야기로 정리하지 않는다. 서로 다른 시대의 작품과 이미지, 개인의 기억과 사회적 사건을 연결하며 아직 발견되지 않은 관계와 새로운 해석의 가능성을 열어둔다.
미술관의 안과 밖, 땅과 허공까지 전시의 공간이 되는 이번 특별전은 토탈미술관의 50년을 돌아보는 동시에, 예술이 난세를 통과하면서 무엇을 기억하고 애도하며 새롭게 상상할 수 있는지를 묻는다.
전시명 | 한국미술 0년: 42개의 이야기
참여작가 | 곽덕준, 곽인식, 공성훈, 금누리, 김구림, 김두진, 김범, 김보라, 김봉준, 김석환, 김승연, 김양동, 김욱규, 김윤신, 김주영A, 김주영B, 김태협, 김효연, 남궁환, 노순택, 듀킴, 루킴, 문서진, 문형민, 박경/스토어프론트, 박기일, 박서보, 방앤리, 백남준, 빠키, 서용선, 서효정, 성능경, 성완경, 성찬경, 손상기, 송성진, 송호준, 신미경, 심문섭, 심정수, 야요, 얄루, 오묘초, 오민, 유현미, 이강소, 이건용, 이도영, 이순종, 이승택, 이용백, 이웅철, 이윰, 이은정, 이상현, 장지아, 정다운, 정민수, 주재환, 차학경, 최성호, 필승, 홍명섭
날짜 | 2026. 10. 16(금) – 2027. 2. 28(일)
장소 | 토탈미술관
총괄기획자 | 이영철
책임큐레이터 | 신보슬
행정실장 | 원윤희
큐레이터 | 김민선, 윤현민
코디네이터 | 김반석, 김서연, 이채령